Women Empowerment Through Self Help
Groups:
A Case Study in the North Tamil Nadu
Introduction
Poverty
and unemployment are the major problems of any under developed
countries, to which India is no exception. In India, at the end
of ninth five year pan 26.1% of the population was living below
poverty line. In the rural area 27.1% of the population was
living under poverty. The overall unemployment rate is estimated
to 7.32%. The female unemployment rate is 8.5%. The rate of
growth of women unemployment in the rural area is 9.8%. This is
because of the low growth rate of new and productive employment.
In the end of IX plan the rate of growth of implemented various
schemes to reduce poverty and to promote the gainful employment.
But the more attractive scheme with less effort (finance) is “Self
Help Group”. It is a too to remove poverty and improve the rural
development (Sabyasachi Das. 2003).
Origin
and Concept of SHGs
The
origin of SHGs is from the brainchild of Grameen Bank of
Bangladesh, which was founded by Mohammed Yunus. SHGs were
started and formed in 1975. In India NABARD is initiated in
1986-87. But the real effort was taken after 1991-92 from the
linkage of SHGs with the banks. A SHG is a small economically
homogeneous affinity group of the rural poor voluntarily coming
together to save small amount regularly, which are deposited in a
common fund to meet members emergency needs and to provide
collateral free loans decided by the group. (Abhaskumar Jha
2000). They have been recognized as useful tool to help the poor
and as an alternative mechanism to meet the urgent credit needs of
poor through thrift (V. M. Rao 2002) SHG is a media for the
development of saving habit among the women (S. Rajamohan 2003).
SHGs enhance the equality of status of women as participants,
decision-makers and beneficiaries in the democratic, economic,
social and cultural spheres of life. (Ritu Jain 2003). The basic
principles of the SHGs are group approach, mutual trust,
organization of small and manageable groups, group cohesiveness,
sprit of thrift, demand based lending, collateral free, women
friendly loan, peer group pressure in repayment, skill training
capacity building and empowerment (N.Lalitha).
In Tamil Nadu the SHGs were started
in 1989 at Dharmapuri District. At present 1.40 lakh groups are
function with 23.83 lakh members. At present, many men also
eager to form a SHGs.
Working of SHGs
SHGs
are working in democratic manner. The upper limit of members in a
group is restricted to 20. Among them a member is selected as an
‘animator’ and two members are selected as the representatives.
The animator is selected for the period of two years. The group
members meet every week. They discuss about the group savings,
rotation of sangha funds, bank loan, repayment of loan, social and
community action programmes.
Functions of
SHGs
-
Create a common fund by the
members through their regular savings.
-
Flexible working system and pool
the resources in a democratic way.
-
Periodical
meeting. The decision making through group meeting.
-
The loan amount is small and
reasonable. So that easy to repay in time.
-
The rate of interest is
affordable, varying group to group and loan to loan. However it
is little higher than the banks but lower than the money
lenders.
From the previous studies related to SHGs, it is
clearly understood that the SHGs are tool to promote rural savings
and gainful employment. Through this the rural poverty is reduced
considerably. Therefore women members are economically
independent and their contribution to household income is also
increased. The present study is also focusing the economic
improvement of women after they joining SHGs.
Objectives
The overall objective of the present study is to
analysis the economic empowerment of women through SHGs in the
north districts of Tamil Nadu. However more specifically:
1.
To study the income, expenditure and
savings of the members after joining SHGs.
2.
To know the role of SHGs in
providing rural credit.
Methodology
The present study has covered the three villages
from north districts of Tamil Nadu Viz., Ponneri Village of
Vellore District, Koodamalai Village of Thiruvannamalai District,
and Paparpatti Village of Dharmapuri District. These three
villages were selected for this study, because of the SHGs in
these villages are functioning very successful manner. The ponneri
village of Vellore district is pioneer in starting make SHGs.
Therefore these villages were selected for the present study.
This study is compiled with the help of the primary
data covered only one year period (2004-05). The primary data
were collected with the help of specially prepared interview
schedule. The schedule included the questions related to the
general information about the SHGs members, income, expenditure,
savings and loan schemes available to SHGs’ members. Totally 134
respondents were selected from 20 SHGs (398 total members) of
three districts y simple random sapling method. The sample size
was 1/3 of the total members in the SHGs. This is purely a
descriptive study. Therefore no complicated models and tools were
used, only percentage and average were used for the analysis.
Analysis and Interpretation
The present study is related to the economic
empowerment of women in the north Tamil Nadu. For this study
three villages were selected from three districts.
This section deals the economic improvement of
women through SHGs. In the study area totally twenty SHGs are
functioning with 398 members (Table-1). From the 398 members 134
respondents were selected for the study.
Table 1 – Membership in SHGs
|
Sl.No. |
Name of the Village |
No. of SHGs |
Total Members |
|
1. |
Ponneri (Vellore District) |
6 |
130 |
|
2. |
Koodamalai (T.V. Malai District) |
8 |
138 |
|
3. |
Papparapatti (Dharmapuri District) |
6 |
130 |
|
|
Total |
20 |
398 |
Source : Primary Data
Age Group of Members of SHGs
Age and socio-economic activities are
inter-related. The young and middle age group people can actively
participate in the socio-economic activities, which is true in the
activities of SHGs in the study area. In the three south district
of Tamil Nadu, 20-30 and 30-40 age groups are actively
participated in the SHGs activities (Table –2). The aged people
(40-50) are also in the SHGs, their role is also important for
SHGs. They can only control and solve the problems arise in the
groups.
Table-2 Age Group of Members of SHGs
|
Sl.No. |
Age Group |
No. of respondents |
Percentage |
|
1. |
Less than 20 |
6 |
4.46 |
|
2. |
20-30 |
30 |
22.39 |
|
3. |
30-40 |
32 |
23.88 |
|
4. |
40-50 |
36 |
26.87 |
|
5. |
50-60 |
18 |
13.43 |
|
6. |
Above 60 |
12 |
8.96 |
|
|
Total |
134 |
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source : Primary Data
Reasons for Joining SHGs
The major aim of the SHGs is to
promote savings and to credit for the productive and consumption
purposes. This is true because many people in the study area
joins the SHGs for getting loan and promote their personal
savings, in addition to get social status Table – 3. In the study
area many people (43.28%) joins the SHGs for getting financial
assistance, 32.84% of the respondents joins the SHGs for the
social status, because SHGs give the identify to the members.
14.92% of the respondents join for improving their savings. For
social, cultural and political improvement (other reasons 8.96%)
some members join in the SHGs.
Table – 3 Reasons for Joining
SHGs
|
Sl. No. |
Reasons |
No. of respondents |
Percentage |
|
1. |
For getting loan |
58 |
43.28 |
|
2. |
For promoting savings |
20 |
14.92 |
|
3. |
For social status |
44 |
32.84 |
|
4. |
For other reasons |
12 |
8.96 |
|
|
Total |
134 |
100.00 |
Source : Primary Data
Income Level of the Members
Income is the major determinant of the standard of
living of the people. The SHGs member income has been increased
after joining the SHGs. Hence women members of the groups are
independent to meet their personal expenditure, and they
contribute more to their household income. Many housewives
(22.39% ) did not earn anything before joining SHGs, but after a
member of the SHGs, they are also earning reasonably. This
increases the willingness to participate in the SHGs’ activities
(Table – 4). Many women members independently involve in the
economic activities individually and with other group members
after joining SHGs. Therefore they are now economically
independent and contribute to increase their household income.
Table 4 Monthly Income of the Members Before and
After Joining SHGs
|
Before Joining SHGs
After Joining SHGs |
|
Sl. No. |
Monthly Income Rs. |
No. of Respondents |
Percentage |
No. of Respondents |
Percentage |
|
1. |
Less than 1000 |
16 |
11.95 |
5 |
3.73 |
|
2. |
1000-2000 |
25 |
18.66 |
26 |
19.40 |
|
3. |
2000-3000 |
42 |
31.34 |
45 |
33.58 |
|
4. |
3000-4000 |
4 |
2.96 |
14 |
10.45 |
|
5. |
4000-5000 |
10 |
7.46 |
33 |
24.63 |
|
6. |
5000-6000 |
5 |
3.75 |
6 |
4.48 |
|
7. |
Above 6000 |
2 |
1.49 |
3 |
2.23 |
|
8. |
Non-earning members |
30 |
22.39 |
2 |
1.49 |
|
|
Total |
134 |
100.00 |
134 |
100.00 |
Source : Primary Data
Expenditure of
the SHG members Family
The family expenditure has been increased due to
positive change in the SHGs members’ income. The incremental
income not only enhance the expenditure of the family but also
promote the savings of the family after they join in the SHGs.
Here the objective of the SHGs is fulfilled. This is a
achievement of the women SHGs in the study area (Table – 5 and
6). Usually working women are being respected by the household
members and the society. Nowadays the women in the SHGs are also
respected by the others, because they are independent in earning
the income and they are contributing to household income,
expenditure and savings. Therefore the above discussion clearly
states that after joining in the SHGs, the members’ well-being has
been increased.
Table – 5 Monthly Family Expenditure of the
Members Before and After Joining SHGs
|
Before Joining SHGs
After Joining SHGs |
|
Sl. No. |
Monthly Income Rs. |
No. of Respondents |
Percentage |
No. of Respondents |
Percentage |
|
1. |
Less than 1000 |
45 |
33.58 |
21 |
15.67 |
|
2. |
1000-2000 |
56 |
41.79 |
35 |
26.12 |
|
3. |
2000-3000 |
25 |
18.66 |
44 |
32.84 |
|
4. |
3000-4000 |
5 |
3.73 |
25 |
18.65 |
|
5. |
Above 4000 |
3 |
2.24 |
9 |
6.72 |
|
|
|
134 |
100.00 |
134 |
100.00 |
Source : Primary Data
Table – 6 Monthly Family Expenditure
of the Members Before and After Joining SHGs
|
Before Joining SHGs
After Joining SHGs |
|
Sl. No. |
Monthly Income Rs. |
No. of Respondents |
Percentage |
No. of Respondents |
Percentage |
|
1. |
Below 100 |
34 |
25.37 |
15 |
11.19 |
|
2. |
100-200 |
29 |
21.64 |
23 |
17.16 |
|
3. |
200-300 |
31 |
23.13 |
30 |
22.39 |
|
4. |
300-400 |
15 |
11.19 |
19 |
14.18 |
|
5. |
400-500 |
16 |
11.94 |
23 |
17.16 |
|
6. |
500-600 |
3 |
2.25 |
18 |
13.44 |
|
7. |
600-700 |
4 |
2.99 |
4 |
2.99 |
|
8. |
Above 700 |
2 |
1.49 |
2 |
1.49 |
|
|
Total |
134 |
100.00 |
134 |
100.00 |
Source : Primary Data
Rural Credit and SHGs
One of the reasons for joining SHGs is to avails
credit (V.M. Rao 2002), which is true in the present study area.
The second objective of the present is to know the rural credit by
SHGs. This part is discussed the rural credit and SHGs in study
area. The credit organizations like nationalized banks,
Co-operative Societies and so on, follow many formalities to
provide credit to the rural people. At the sometime village money
lenders change very high rate of interest. In this situation SHGs
are the boon to the rural people, because instead of approaching
banks individual, SHGs can easily approach the banks and other
institutions to get loan. The SHGs get loan from credit
institutions then, they refinance (share) to the members in the
SHGs. The SHGs charge reasonable interest. In the study are the
prevailing interest rate is 1% to 4%. All the members are
responsible to repay the loan to the banks. Therefore members are
repaid the loan in time. (Table – 9 ). Moreover banks instruct
the members to save minimum Rs. 200 per month. So re-payment is
very easy to SHGs. The loans can be used by individual group
members for their personal needs, sometime the group may invest on
any economic activities. Nowadays many SHGs are starting small
business, cottage industries, food processing units etc. The
SHGs in the study area grant the loan to their member for various
purposes. The maximum loan amount per members is decided by the
general body meeting (Table – 7). Almost all the members in the
study area are availing the loan facilities in their SHGs (Table –
8).
Table – 7 Types of
Loans in the SHGs
|
Sl.No. |
Types of the Loan |
Maximum amount Rs. |
|
1. |
Business Loan |
20,000 to 25,000 |
|
2. |
Marriage Loan |
Upto 20,000 |
|
3. |
Repay the old Loan |
10,000 to 15,000 |
|
4. |
Medical Loan |
10,000 to 15,000 |
|
5. |
House repairing Loan |
Upto 5,000 |
|
6. |
Cattle Loan |
5,000 to 7,500 |
Source : Primary Data
Note: The rate of interest is 1% to
4%. It varies group o group
Table – 8 Amount of Loan Availed by
the members Through SHGs
|
Sl.No. |
Availed Loan Amount Rs. |
No. of Respondents |
Percentage
|
|
1. |
Less than 5,000
|
23 |
17.16 |
|
2. |
5,000 to 10,000 |
28 |
20.90 |
|
3. |
10,000 to 15,000 |
29 |
21.64 |
|
4. |
15,000 to 20,000 |
35 |
26.12 |
|
5. |
Above 20,000 |
19 |
14.18 |
|
|
Total
|
134 |
100.00 |
Source : Primary Data
Table – 9 Repayment of Loan by SHGs’
Members
|
Sl.No. |
Particulars |
No. of Respondents |
Percentage
|
|
1. |
Repayment in time
|
86 |
64.18 |
|
2. |
Repayment in advance |
25 |
18.66 |
|
3. |
Repayment not in time |
23 |
17.16 |
|
|
Total |
134 |
100.00 |
Source : Primary Data
Conclusion
The study was undertaken the women empowerment
through SHGs in the north Tamil Nadu. It is found that the income
of the women has been increased after joining the SHGs. So that
the monthly household expenditure also has been raised
considerable level. But the savings is increasing at slow rate,
because the incremental expenditure is higher. Mostly they are
spending for present consumption. The members should change it.
The good practice of the women SHGs in the study area is repayment
of the loan in time. Nearly 64% of the debtor paid their monthly
due with in the time, even some members 19% paid their due in
advance. A few members do not pay in time but this is not
affecting the further credit of SHGs. Since the repayment of loan
is regular and within the time, we may conclude that the economic
activities of SHGs are quite success. In this way SHGs in north
Tamil Nadu are very successful to develop women empowerment and
rural areas.
References:
1.
Krishana, Vijaya R. and Das,
Amarnath R. (2003), “ Self Help Groups” – A Study in A.P.
District, HRD Times, May.
2.
Rasure K. A. (2003), “Women’s
Empowerment Through SHGs”, Journal of Fact for yo9u, November.
3.
Rose K. (1992), Where Women are
Leaders : The SEWA Movement in India, New Delhi: Vistar
Publications ( An Division of Sage Publications India).
4.
Siddiqui, Saif (2003), “Rural
Entrepreneurship and Poverty Alleviation Programmes”. Yojana,
December.
5.
Manimekalai N. and G. Rajeswari
(2002), “Grassroots Entrepreneurship through Self Help Groups (SHGs)”.
SEDMI Journal, Vol. 29 p2.
6.
Naranaswamy N.S. Manivel and B.
Bhaskar (2003), “Networking SHGs and Cooperatives – An Analysis of
strengths and Weaknesses”, Journal of Rural Development. Vol.22 p
3.
7.
Simanowitz A. (2000), “Targeting the
Poor-Comparing Visual and Participatory Methods”, Small Enterprise
Development, Vol. 11, P.1.
8.
Ariz Ah;med, M. (1999), “ Women
Empowerment: Self Help Groups:, Kurukshetra, April, 47, 7: 19,20 &
49
9.
Chatterjee, Sankar (2003), “
Networking SGSY, Banks and SHGs: Initiatives in Uttar Pradesh”,
Kurukshetra, February, 51,4: 27-29
10.
Damayanthi, U.T. (1999), “
Development of Women and Children in Rural Areas – An Impact
Study”, The Asian Economic Review, August, 41, 2:349-357
11.
Dodkey, M.D. (1999), “SHGs and Micro
Credit, Sustaining Rural Women”, Social Welfare, March, 45. 12:
19-20
12.
Gopalakrishnan B.K. (1998), “SHGs
and Social Defence”, Social Welfare, January, 44. 10: 30-34
13.
Kokila K. (2001), “Credit Groups for
Women workers:, social Welfare, May, 48.2: 23-25
14.
Lalitha, N. (1998), “Micro Finance:
Rural NGOs and Banks Networking”, Social Welfare, October,
45.7:13-17.
15.
Lalitha N. and B.S. Nagarajan
(2002), “Self Help Groups in Rural Development”, New Delhi:
dominant Publishers and Distributors.
16.
Mangathai R.A. (2001), “ Together We
Stand (Success Story)”, Kurukshetra, November, 50. 30-31
17.
Nair, Tara S. (1998), “Meeting the
Credit Needs of the Micro Enterprise Sector: Issues in Focus”, The
Indian Journal of Labour Economics, July-Setember, 41.3:531-538
18.
Narashimban Sakunatala, (1999),
“Empowering Women: An Alternative Strategy for Rural India”, New
Delhi: Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
19.
Abhaskumar Jha (2004), “Lending to
the Poor: Designs for Credit”, EPW, Vol. XXXV, No.8 and 9.
20.
Jeyanthi Gayari, R (2002), “SHGs in
Kanyakumari District”, M.Phil., dissertation submitted to Alagappa
University, Karaikudi, T.N.
21.
Jeyaraman, R. et al., (2004), “Role
of Self help Groups in Fisher Women Development,” Peninsular
Economist, Vol. XII, No.2, pp. 197-200.
22.
Lalitha, N. “Women Thrift and Credit
Groups- Breaking the Barriers at the Gross Roots”, Peninsular
Economist, Vol. XII No. 2, pp. 188-195
23.
Manimekalai, N. et. al., “Gross-root
Women Entreprenurship through SHGs”, Peninsular Economist Vol.
XII, No.2, pp. 181-187
24.
Rajamohan, S. (2003) , “Activities
of Self Help Groups in Virudhunagar District-A Study, TNJC, pp.
25-29
25.
Rao, V.M. (2003), Women Self Help
Groups, Profiles from Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka”, Kurukshetra,
Vol. 50, N0.6, pp. 26-32
26.
Ritu Jain, (2003), “Socio-Economics
Impact Through Self Help Groups”, Yojana, Vol. 47, No.7, pp.11-12
27.
Sabyasachi Das, (2003),‘Self Help
Groups and Micro Credit Synbergic Integration”, Kurushetra Vol.
51, No.10, pp. 25-28
28.
Bandhyopadhyay, D, B.N. Yughandhar
and Amitava Mukherjee (2000), “Convergencce of Programmes by
Empowering SHGs and PRIs”, Economic and Political Weekly, June 29
29.
Chiranjeevulu T. (2003), “Empowering
Women Through Self Help Groups – Experiences in Experiment”,
Kurukshetra, March.
30.
Chopra Kanchan (2004), “Social
Capital and Development Processes – Role of Formal and Informal
Institutions “, Economic and Political Weekly, July, 13.
31.
K. Usha (2003), “Gender , Equality
and Development”, Yojana
32.
Kapadia, Karin (1997), “Mediating
the Meaning of Market Opportunities Gender, Cast and Class in
Rural south India”, Economic and Political Weekly.
33.
Keishnaraj, Maithreyi (2005),
‘Growth and rural Poverty”, Economic and Political Weekly,
September 21.